The most intelligent information and analysis, from all angles, from the Internet:
The Biden administration wants to rewrite the economic laws, said Noah Rothman The cost of MSNBC. “Activists have been demanding” that the government force companies to hire more of their workers as employees instead of independent contractors. Now the Labor Department is giving them what they want, proposing new guidelines this month that would replace Trump-era policies. Not surprisingly, shares of Uber and Lyft, two benchmarks of the gig economy, fell on the news. But the proposed rules have implications that go beyond shared services. The administration is following in the footsteps of California, which enacted a freelance law that changed the jobs of “independent writers, illustrators, artists, journalists, and producers” – many of whom “didn’t seem to appreciate the reform” passed on their behalf. .
All of the proposed changes will “just bring the Labor Department policy back in line” with what it was before the Trump years, Timothy Noah said. The New Republic. The statutes at issue stemmed from two 1947 Supreme Court cases “that established the test of ‘real estate’ generally based on six questions,” including whether the employee’s services are essential to the business and the extent to which the business is owned by the employee. The Trump administration took notice of the incident and made it “easier to classify an employee as an independent contractor” — allowing companies like Uber and FedEx to continue to take advantage of their workers.
I’m an Instacart and Uber driver, and I don’t feel taken advantage of, said Roman Juela in Chance. I am also an architect. During the epidemic, I realized that I needed extra money, “but finding a full-time job was not necessary.” The Labor Department’s proposal “would make independent work more difficult, and reduce the freedom and flexibility I enjoy today.” Changes in the way workers are distributed will have “unpredictable” consequences, says Morgan Meaker in Wired. Surprisingly, Uber and Lyft, the primary targets of California’s 2019 legislation, were able to win on the statewide ballot. But the law “has also changed many other industries, from yoga studios to theaters and car dealerships.” Think about the naked. Although the law ensured that foreign dancers received lower wages, club owners also changed their businesses to “reduce income from private dances” – which made more money for the dancers.
It’s understandable that pro-labor and liberal policymakers want to “put as many workers into the ‘worker’ bucket as possible,” says Christian Britschgi. Because, “to assure more people the extra pay and benefits that come with that name.” But these efforts are often opposed by the sports industry itself, “which opposes more regulation and standardization.” A broader federal definition of worker would also impose more restrictions on the state. As gig economy arrangements proliferate across the country, this fight is just beginning.
This article was originally published in the latest issue of Sabbath magazine. If you want to read more like that, you can try six risk-free magazines Here.
You might like it too
The US economy is growing for the first time in six months
Kanye West gets kicked out of Skechers offices after showing up ‘unannounced and uninvited’
Nancy Pelosi’s husband ‘brutally assaulted’ her California home
